Op-Ed By Sir Geo - September 16, 2024
This is only a theory, but it is a theory that I believe to be true. Donald Trump is a political mastermind who engineered his own assassination attempts to manipulate public opinion, solidify his status as a political martyr, and galvanize his base. This is a theory, however the objective facts fit the theory.
According to this theory, Trump’s political strategy is built on portraying himself as a man under constant attack—by the media, the establishment, and global elites. By staging an assassination attempt, he can claim that the powerful forces he always speaks about are so threatened by his populist message that they would resort to extreme measures to silence him.
This would serve several key objectives:
Public Sympathy: The failed assassination attempt would instantly catapult Trump into the role of a victim, reinforcing the idea that he is a leader who is under attack by those who fear his "truth-telling" ways.
Rallying His Supporters: His loyal base, already prone to seeing him as the target of an unjust system, would be more energized, believing that his life was in danger due to the boldness of his political message.
Distracting from Other Issues: During times of political turmoil or legal investigations, such an attempt could act as a smokescreen to deflect attention from controversies or scandals surrounding him.
Strengthening His Control Over the Republican Party: In the aftermath of the "attempt," other Republican leaders would rally around him, unwilling to challenge a figure who was "nearly taken down" by enemies of the country.
In this fictional scenario, Trump would allegedly recruit or use loyal insiders to carry out the fake assassination attempt. These could be people within his private security team or fringe operatives who owe him loyalty or favor. The goal would be to ensure the "attack" looks real enough to convince the public but is controlled in such a way that Trump is never in any actual danger.
The assassination attempt would be timed perfectly for media consumption, perhaps during a rally or high-profile public appearance, where the cameras and the audience are watching closely. The incident would be quick, dramatic, and designed to trigger an immediate emotional reaction, but ultimately, it would be a controlled event, with the "assassin" subdued swiftly before causing any real harm.
In the days following the attempt, Trump's media allies would push the narrative of the president as a political martyr, emphasizing how his enemies would go to any length to stop him from saving America. Social media platforms would be flooded with speculation about the orchestrators of the plot, ranging from "deep state" actors to foreign governments.
To keep the conspiracy under wraps, Trump’s team would need to ensure that only loyal insiders are aware of the true origins of the plot. Any whistleblowers or individuals with knowledge of the plan would be silenced, either through financial incentives or veiled threats. Public investigations would be diverted or controlled to focus on supposed political enemies rather than Trump himself.
In this theory, some elements would be misled into believing they were genuinely part of an effort to protect Trump from a real threat, ensuring that even high-level security forces are unknowingly complicit.
Following the assassination attempt, Trump’s popularity skyrockets. Those who doubted him now believe he is genuinely being targeted by powerful enemies. The incident creates a rallying cry that reignites his political career, giving him leverage over his rivals and silencing dissenters within the Republican Party.
In the ultimate twist, even years after the event, the truth of the plot never comes to light. It remains a closely guarded secret, buried beneath layers of misdirection, half-truths, and speculation, allowing Trump to continue benefiting from the public’s sympathy.
While this scenario could serve as an engaging storyline in a novel, movie, or political thriller, it's important to emphasize that it is purely speculative. In the real world, promoting conspiracy theories without evidence can have damaging effects, contributing to the erosion of trust in institutions, the spread of misinformation, and societal division. Always be cautious about consuming and spreading unverified claims, and prioritize fact-based discussions when dealing with sensitive topics.